The victory of truth – Weds 12th Aug

It’s windy at the café but I find a table in a relatively sheltered spot next to a family with three fractious toddlers, all of whom are vying for first place in a tantrum competition. Maybe I can photograph them too? I’ll have to work my seat round a bit to bring them into view… only then a dapper man, venerable but sprightly, comes over to me and asks if he can share my table out of the wind? “Of course” I reply. As he sits down there is that tense moment when I’m wondering if my new tablemate is going to start telling me the KKK had some good ideas, or something, but it’s ok, he just remarks that he used to smoke my brand of tobacco before he gave up.

The wind is being mischievous, jerking the windbreaks and the parasols which, being attached to the tables, means we both have to dive for our teas, half their contents now running shorewards across the green plastic. Then a girl wearing a crown of blue artificial flowers bounces up. She seems to know the dapper man. He gets up to buy her a tea, leaving me alone with her. We smile, as you do, and I’m expecting her to sit and wait for him, but she launches straight into this bubbly interview, only without the gaps you’re supposed to leave for replies. She’s asking me “Don’t you think weddings are so wonderful?” and she’s just been to such a beautiful one up the road and the bride and groom are so happy and she’s going to do so many things and…

And I’m just wondering if I can find a way of sneaking off but at the same time I’m fascinated. The dapper man returns with two more teas which he places on the table. The wind immediately responds, jerking the umbrella, so now there are four little streams running across the table towards the shore. The girl lifts up her mug and cradles it while continuing about the wedding at which, it seems, she was dressed as a plastic champagne bottle, she then spreads a map of Inverness in front of me telling me she’s just run the entire route outlined in red biro and extolling the beauty of the Scottish countryside. She adds that we all need to work towards ecologically sound transportation. The dapper man takes some exception to this, telling her that, as a species, we are not yet evolved enough. Then he tells me that she is an artist, or certainly very creative, although the girl replies that she is into P.E. and she’s going to be running around the whole of Scandinavia soon – she likes to keep things off the map – and then tells me I should get married again (again? I haven’t actually told her I’m divorced) because she thinks I’d look really smart in a suit. In fact she thinks we should all get married again, despite the fact that her last marriage was a disaster, but after all she was very young then (how old is she now? She doesn’t look more than about twenty). “You should both be married!” she repeats. The dapper man and I both “hmm” in unison. He likes his freedom. This morning he woke up and decided he was going to go to the races, he didn’t have to ask anyone else what they thought and he’s now won £290, but she’s off again about ecologically sound global transportation and the dapper man makes the mistake of telling her she lacks experience, to which she snaps back with a lecture about ageism, not helped by him saying “but you won’t tell me how old you are?” And yet they both seem to like each other and the argument is a bit like the ones you see between old married couples.

I’m transfixed. I can’t work out if I’m enjoying this or not, but I think I probably am and anyway, if he doesn’t know how old she is, then how well do they know each other? I’d assumed he was an uncle or grandfather, but now I’m beginning to wonder. I start to drift, letting their conversation wash over me like a play on the radio you aren’t really listening to. Only then I see a wheelchair, thankfully empty, accelerating directly towards a table occupied by a couple eating fried breakfasts. There is a crash and some exclamations. Two seagulls take advantage of the confusion to grab a few gulletfulls of chips. The dapper man, trying to see what’s happened, leans forward in his chair, which gives way at the legs, sending him sprawling. The girl and I both get up to help him and she’s instantly off to dispose of the broken chair. While she’s gone I take the opportunity to ask him how long they’ve known each other, to which he replies “Good God man! I only met her an hour ago while we were both watching the same wedding. When I suggested a cup of tea I was being polite, I didn’t expect her to follow me.”

The girl is now back, telling us that a broken chair is good luck and she wants to go to a fox hunt but she thinks it’s a pity that foxes get killed and can’t the dogs just follow and she could run along with them? The dapper man interjects, saying that fox-hunters are all townies. I try to add my own comments on this topic but since they are both off again on quite independent conversations I relax back into my chair. The girl really just wants to see one fox in the UK as she’s lived here for a while now but she’s only ever seen them in Finland. The dapper man and I are surprised as you can see them hanging round the town’s bins on most nights. The girl wants to know if they eat rabbits and are there lots of rabbits in town too? The dapper man says myxomatosis was a terrible thing and he hasn’t eaten a rabbit in years. The girl then asks us how long we’ve known each other, to which we reply that we’ve just met. She thinks this is great and I should take a picture, which I do, after which I feel we really should introduce each other.
“Chris”.
“Noel”
“Donna Lukander Victory Of Truth, at the moment, but I’m experimenting with names.” “Do you have one that’s a bit more stable we can use in the meantime?”
“Oh, well, the name my family gave me is Iida”

At this point a short-handled broom flies past us, missing our table by only a few feet. Andrew the table-clearing man is back from his holidays and evidently the pigeons have become far too friendly in his absence. As the cloud of startled birds lifts off into the air I sit back in my chair once more, knowing my day is now complete.

Red or dead – Fri 7th Aug

Some years ago I was having a conversation with a friend about favourite paintings in the National Gallery. Although we managed a shortlist, neither of us could decide on particular pieces so, to try and focus things, I think it was I who suggested: “what if the gallery was on fire and you only had enough time to rescue one piece before the ceiling collapsed?” This proved difficult for both of us. My choice was ‘Bacchus and Ariadne’ by Titian. I can’t remember what his was because he immediately upped the stakes, coming back at me with:

“So now imagine yourself in the burning gallery, the roof creaking ominously overhead and you’re there by the Titan, but in front of you an old lady lies hurt and incapable of standing. Do you carry out the painting, or her?” What could I say? It’d have to be the old lady that got saved. He agreed. We’d be monsters if we didn’t choose her.

But this wasn’t enough for him. He then asked me: “Ok, same situation, but now, instead of it being a choice between the old lady or the Titian, what if you find that a cat has got into the gallery somehow and you know for certain that it’s either the Titian or the cat?”

We pondered this for a bit, but finally both agreed that the cat would have to be saved first. Neither of us would ever be able to sleep peacefully again, imagining the terrified yowling of an animal we’d spurned in favour of a thing. Don’t get me wrong. I would probably risk my life trying to rescue a national treasure, but what is the point of art if it doesn’t make you understand better what it is to be human? Which is why I think Jonathan Jones, the art critic for the Guardian, is a twat.

Here’s his article:

http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2015/aug/04/national-gallery-strikes-turn-me-tory-mark-serwotka-pcs-union

La-la-la-la – Weds 22nd July

I met her in a club down in old Soho
Where you drink champagne and it tastes just like cherry-cola
See-oh-el-aye cola
She walked up to me and she asked me to dance
I asked her her name and in a dark brown voice she said Lola
El-oh-el-aye Lola la-la-la-la Lola

Well I’m not the world’s most physical guy
But when she squeezed me tight she nearly broke my spine
Oh my Lola la-la-la-la Lola
Well I’m not dumb but I can’t understand
Why she walked like a woman and talked like a man
Oh my Lola la-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola

Well we drank champagne and danced all night
Under electric candlelight
She picked me up and sat me on her knee
And said dear boy won’t you come home with me
Well I’m not the world’s most passionate guy
But when I looked in her eyes well I almost fell for my Lola
La-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola
Lola la-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola
I pushed her away
I walked to the door
I fell to the floor
I got down on my knees
Then I looked at her and she at me

Well that’s the way that I want it to stay
And I always want it to be that way for my Lola
La-la-la-la Lola
Girls will be boys and boys will be girls
It’s a mixed up muddled up shook up world except for Lola
La-la-la-la Lola

Well I left home just a week before
And I’d never ever kissed a woman before
But Lola smiled and took me by the hand
And said dear boy I’m gonna make you a man

Well I’m not the world’s most masculine man
But I know what I am and I’m glad I’m a man
And so is Lola
La-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola
Lola la-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola

Ray Davies
(Published by Hill & Range Songs)

The Birth of Venus – Mon 6th July

It seems obvious to say that one of the most important things about photography is knowing where to point your camera. But implicit in this is that, in doing so, you are therefore always excluding a lot of other things. I’m just as guilty of this as any other photographer. I don’t see how you could do otherwise, given that the camera viewfinder gives you a rectangle that only allows so much of the world to be present in any particular shot. But doing this inevitably creates a certain view of the world out of which narratives breed. It always make me laugh hearing the old phrase ‘the camera never lies’ as, even without the panoply of digital correction and retouching techniques now available, omission itself is another kind of falsehood. Photographers never tell the whole truth.

So anyway, today I was delighted to find a photographic crew engaged in just such an act of exclusion down at the spot I’ve started taking my panoramas from. They were there for quite a while; so was I.

Judging by the length of the lens I’d say the shots they were looking for would be close, probably only a head and shoulders with a bit of the sea in the background, no horizon, compressed, narrow depth of field. Also, judging by the cost of the lens (Canon L series lenses have all the self-effacing diffidence of a Maserati) and all the other paraphernalia: circular reflector, several expensive bags full of other mysterious goodies, plus the fact there was three of them to take a picture of one girl, heavily made up to look natural, I’d say this was a professional outfit taking pictures destined for a teen fashion magazine or perhaps a catalogue.

I was also struck by the difference between the girl in front of the lens, and those behind it constructing the shot: their attitude of control, concentration and intent; her passivity. They could have just as well have been taking a picture of a vase of flowers, or a car.

I wanted to ask: Which magazine? What for? Is it a lifestyle shot, makeup suggestions, or for advertising swimwear? I wanted to ask the girl what she thought of all this? But by the time I’d finished taking my photographs the woman with the reflector (I think she was the one managing the shoot) had started to look pretty grumpy so I decided I’d better not push my luck.

If anyone reading this comes across the final picture, do let me know. I’d love to find out how the world looked from their point of view.

Wall St – Weds 1st July

Last night I shared a post I found on facebook comparing the cost of the Greek bailout with the amount used to prop up the banks following the banking crisis a few years ago. The figures were compelling; it also turns out they were fabricated. This is sad because the author had made a good point, and if he had checked his sources he would have found that, while the amount the banks were bailed out by was different to the figures he quoted, it was still colossal in comparison to what Greece needs. Therefore here is some more reliable information:

An article posted in the Guardian on 12th September 2011 (since updated, 20th May 2014) quotes a number of figures based on different factors, but concludes:

“not only has the [UK] government bailed the banks out to the tune of £123.93bn, and at its peak had liabilities for the banking crisis of £1.2 trillion, but the value of its stakes in the biggest banks has plummeted and the interest it is receiving on the loans is relatively small. The interest collected is smaller than that the government pays on its debts, taken out to refinance the banks”

Source: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/reality-check-with-polly-curtis/2011/sep/12/reality-check-banking-bailout

A report published by the USA’s Congressional Budget Office provides several more figures on the American banking crisis. These include:

“By CBO’s estimate, $428 billion of the initially authorized $700 billion will be disbursed through the TARP, including $419 billion that has already been disbursed and $9 billion in additional projected disbursements. The cost to the federal government of the TARP’s transactions (also referred to as the subsidy cost), including grants for mortgage programs that have not yet been made, will amount to $21 billion, CBO estimates…”

Source: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/44256_TARP.pdf

$21bn doesn’t sound very much in comparison to other figures mentioned, but it should be pointed out that this was the actual cost of the bailout, i.e. what the American tax payer won’t ever get back, not the amount of the loans considered necessary, deemed to be $700 billion. It also doesn’t take into account the appalling personal losses through mortgage foreclosures, job losses etc.

The current IMF estimate of the additional loan needed to prop up Greece is 52 billion euros. Of course Greece will need more if it is to finance itself for a full recovery, plus far better repayment terms based on sane levels of economic growth. And consider this: Greece is not a bank, it is a country of just over 11 million people, including children, the old and the sick. Furthermore, the situation Greece is now in is just as much, if not more, to do with the incompetence and near-sightedness (and obsession with propping up banks) of other European Governments, than it is to do with it’s own fiscal inadequacies, yet an entire nation is set to suffer as a result of decisions made by politicians and executives who only seem to have compassion when it comes to their own kind, not others.

Here’s one more quote, from the EU constitution:

“The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.”

(Article 1-2 The Union’s values. Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe as signed in Rome on 29 October 2004)

Panorama – Tues 30th June

Over the past few months I’ve been out nearly every day taking pictures of anything that interested me. Mostly, I’ve found myself drawn to marginalia and odd details. I wanted to document the sorts of things one might easily overlook, but which had beauty, or strangeness, or ‘something’ even if I wasn’t sure quite what, to show how interesting the world can be if one only takes the time to look. However, in focusing on small things, there is a danger of missing the obvious.

A few days ago I was having a conversation with Jack and Mark, two of the guys at another café on the seafront. They asked me if I had any shots of the pier; they needed one for a billboard. I had to admit I didn’t, beyond close ups. So I decided to find a spot on the beach where I could get the whole thing in, side on, without any distortion. Of course this meant including a lot of beach packed with people, which creates the problem of framing the shot so there aren’t too many cut off heads sticking up into the bottom of the frame, which meant including quite a lot of the beach, and the sea, and a fair bit of the promenade too, by which point, I realized if I wanted to preserve any detail I’d have to take several photographs and stitch them together as a panorama.

It was only when I started piecing together about 30 photographs that I became engrossed in what I’d got. It seemed like all of life was going on before me – something brought out more by it being a still rather than a first-hand experience. Who are they? Where are they from? What kinds of lives do they lead? How many are falling in, or out of love?

I know none of these are particularly new observations, but that doesn’t diminish their power, so since that first one I’ve taken several more over 3 separate days. This one is of Brighton beach on a really hot day (taken for today’s entry of course). Even though it was shot around 5pm and it’s not yet quite high season, the place is literally jumping.

The version you see here is scaled down a lot so it doesn’t take forever to load onto your screens, but the original is about 2m long (at 240dpi) – a high definition representation of everyone visible at that moment in time. It feels like I’ve captured the whole world – in which case maybe it isn’t so different to the other photographs I’ve been taking, only this time it’s one panorama assembled out of fragments, rather than a contact sheet of different moments representing a journey.

And, of course, look at all those stones! I wonder which of them will end up being photographed in close-up some time in the future…

I think I might do some more over the coming weeks.

Ongoing – Tues 23rd June

The man at the café continues his solo crusade to keep the tables a bird-free zone. It’s almost as if he can see through the furniture to the pigeons lurking beneath. In answer, the pigeons have now so finely tuned their sensitivity to danger, that even a raised arm (if it’s the one holding the long handled brush of fear) is enough for them all to take to the air. Of course as soon as his back is turned, the chip-thieves reappear out of nowhere once more…

And the birds also know it’s only him they need worry about. Martin, another member of the café crew has tried similar tactics but to no avail – the pigeons seem to scoff at his efforts. As Martin says: “I just don’t have the authority”. We’ve both discussed the man’s obsession. Is it really necessary? What drives him? Surely he must know it’s as useless as trying to hold back the tides? (Though we’ve both admitted a certain admiration for the fact he seems to be doing just that).

And, what makes his performance all the more extraordinary, is that we have both seen him round the back of the café, away from the tourists, feeding with great care and tenderness the same birds he terrorises in public. It’s as if he has a Jekyll and Hyde split. Or maybe the back of the café is the gateway to a parallel universe where all of us have opposite personalities to the ones we possess in this universe. Or maybe it’s more mundane; maybe he’s just trying to teach the birds that it’s ok to eat, just not on the café tables, that he has a job to do and the tourists must be left in peace when they are eating. Maybe he is actually a keen ornithologist who, through some cruel quirk of fate has founds himself with a job that demands this behaviour and as a result every night he goes home and weeps silently into his pillow at the horror of what he has to do, and maybe he feeds them out of guilt: a kind of penance to make up for his public despotism.

We just don’t understand. However, we have both also spotted that, despite the fact that he seems to have a very good aim – he’s never once hit a tourist – he’s also never once hit a bird either.

Ta da da dad da daa da – Sat June 13th

I’m not spending Saturday night in Brighton this weekend, but you can never quite be free of the place can you? Waiting for a train connection at Clapham Junction I hear the unmistakeable sound of a hen party yelling the Conga. Looking up, this is what I see. No prizes for guessing where they are heading for the evening.