Graeae – 26th Nov 2015

“Which of the daughters
Of Phorkyas are you?
Since I liken you
To that family.

Are you perhaps one of the Graeae,
A single eye and a single tooth,
Owned alternately between you,
One born of greyness?”

Goethe, ‘Faust part II’
Translated by A. S. Kline

Good as red – 25th Nov 2015

“Mr. James Hennessy offered a resolution that the entire body proceed forthwith to Newark and get drunk… Then the Democrats charged upon the street cars, and being wafted into Newark proceeded, to use their own metaphor, to ‘paint the town red’.”
New York Times 1883

“…because they would be paid up in Chicago for their half-year’s work, and would then do their best towards painting that town in purest vermilion.”
Rudyard Kipling, ‘A Little More Beef’ 1889

“And there he was at the end of his tether after having often painted the town tolerably pink without a beggarly stiver.”
James Joyce, ‘Ulysses’ 1920

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres…”
Matthew 23:27 (King James version) 1611

Sleeping giants – 24th Nov 2015

“Deep in the shady sadness of a vale,
Far sunken from the healthy breath of morn,
Far from the fiery noon, and eve’s one star,
Sat gray-hair’d Saturn, quiet as a stone,
Still as the silence round about his lair.”

Opening lines to John Keats,’Hyperion’ Book 1 (1820)

Enigma

I’ve already mentioned in older posts how some stones I find lend themselves to being photographed, having one good angle that seems to exemplify its personality, while others need to be turned in your hand to fully appreciate the peculiarity of the object. The stone pictured above is another example of this latter category. One image doesn’t do it justice so I’ve decided to present here a page showing twelve different angles of the same stone, in the hope that it might convey more of its character. Even then, I’m not sure how well I’ve succeeded.

It’s quite small, a little larger than a nob of chewing gum. Probably a fossil washed along the coast from Eastbourne or Beachy Head and therefore, given the local geology, likely to date from the Cretaceous Period. It seems to have a kind of three-point symmetry, yet at the same time, the object as a whole is more organic than geometric, so this symmetry is somewhat obscure. Holding the stone and looking at it now, it seems to me that the best way to describe it is thus:

Imagine a pair of underpants stretched tightly around a loaf of uncooked dough, so that the elastic of the material bulges the dough out of the three openings designed for two legs and a waist, each of these extrusions of the dough ball remaining rounded as they protrude from their restricting bond. At the same time, the stone as a whole is reminiscent of an unbaked croissant or other kind of pastry where the dough has been folded over on itself to result in soft ridges, merging back somewhat into the main mass of the dough yet remaining distinct.

I think the above is an accurate description, but its banality undermines the strangeness of the object. It is, after all, a shape made of stone and ultimately, stones aren’t supposed to do things like this unless they are created as a cast of the remains of something long dead. Yet I’ve searched through all three volumes of my book of British fossils and can’t find anything like it. The closest in similarity are the echinoids (sea urchins) but all of these are based on variations of five-point symmetry not three. Part of me is annoyed at not being able to name it, but another part, I think the greater, takes huge delight in finding an object that seems to so elude classification.

Of Comets – 22nd Nov 2015

“Now it must be asked if we can comprehend why comets signify the death of magnates and coming wars, for writers of philosophy say so. The reason is not apparent, since vapour no more rises in a land where a pauper lives than where a rich man resides, whether he be king or someone else. Furthermore, it is evident that a comet has a natural cause not dependent on anything else; so it seems that it has no relation to someone’s death or to war. For if it be said that it does relate to war or someone’s death, either it does so as a cause or effect or sign.”

‘De Cometis’ Albertus Magnus (1200-1280ad)

Worthing tour – 21st Nov 2015

A long, long time ago I played in a band with a guitarist called Frank. His timing was sometimes a bit off and frequently what was supposed to be a twelve-bar came out anywhere between eleven and a half and fourteen (actually this is quite common among blues players), but despite these quirks he had a very convincing way of playing. He’d lived in the Projects in Chicago at the end of the sixties, married the daughter of one of the big players and even spent some time in an American sanatorium. This gave him blues credibility and, despite a tendency towards jumpiness if he forgot his pills, he was considered by many to be the ‘real deal’. He taught me a lot.

One of our more salubrious gigs was in a place called ‘Hustlers’ in Worthing. A bar above one of the pubs on the sea front, there wasn’t a stage as such, just an end of a largish room. The carpet had seen better days. Once it must have been a deep, swirling red, but years of cigarette ash, spilled drinks and the trampling of wet shoes in from the coast-road outside had given it a grey, slightly leathery sheen, through which the pattern nevertheless still fought for attention. It might have looked better if it had shown signs of a recent vacuuming, but with clubs, once the lights are turned down it’d be too dark to notice, and the barman looked like he was used to relying on this fact.

Punters started drifting in while we were still setting up the gear and by the time we began playing we had a smallish audience of about forty people, consisting largely of what looked like TV repair men accompanied, not so much by rock-chicks, as fully fledged chickens.

Frank’s signature move consisted of a kind of whallop-like power-chord, not dissimilar to Pete Townsend’s windmill guitar, but more of a one off strum, this often accompanying a vocal declamation such as “Ah got the Bluuuuues” his cheeks and bottom lip blowing out explosively as he pronounced the ‘B’ while his right arm descended on the guitar with a satisfying clang. When this happened you’d know that Frank would now be in the zone and some marvellous improvisation would likely ensue. Only on this occasion, the explosive was accompanied by something shooting across the room past his microphone and Frank immediately turned to me yelling: “Chris, solo!” This didn’t usually happen and I must have been visibly taken aback, because he then leaned over to me and bellowed in my ear, just loud enough for me to hear under the rest of the band: “I’ve, lost, my, teeth” at which point he unslung his guitar and disappeared into the audience.

I have probably played better solos than the one I performed that night, but it was certainly my longest, sorely testing my abilities to create a meaningful dynamic when, each time I approached a possible climax, I had to check the progress of our lost guitarist, diving hither and thither between the legs of people dancing or just standing holding their drinks. Eventually though he reappeared clutching his prized dentures, giving them a quick wipe on his T-shirt before popping them back into his mouth.

I don’t remember much of the rest of the gig. All I could think about was the carpet, and how much of it was now in Frank’s mouth.

Nation of hoodies –20th Nov 2015

“Across the country, violence, vandalism, theft and disorder are an everyday menace, created by faceless gangs of youths with little fear of ever being caught.
Streets, trains, buses and shopping centres have become no-go zones for terrified citizens who have been intimidated by hoodies for too long.”

Daily Express
Mar 30th, 2008

Sea dogs 18th Nov 2015

Today I spent some time on the pier watching the sea. We’re in the end of a hurricane and the waves were coming in higher than usual under the weathered boards, sometimes only a few yards away from where the starlings sleep. Occasionally small groups of them took flight towards the marina, perhaps in search of somewhere less perilous to roost, the wind buffeting them as they sped across the grey-green water.

Waves crashed in, some mountainous, some merely huge. I began to notice it was not the tallest ones that made the biggest explosions as they hit Albion Groyne, but those that seemed lower, faster, more angry. Yet despite their speed they never seemed to catch up with the waves in front. It was as if they deliberately distorted time, creating the excuse to race and rage in the hunt for their predecessors; low-hunched wolves with foaming mouths hurling themselves at the shore.

Yummy mummy… – 16th Nov 2015

Ever since the birth of art, fashion, bodily adornment, tribal differentiation, ritual decoration… we as a species have looked for different colours in the world around us to brighten things up a bit. You name it, we’ve used it, dyes and pigments from roots, vegetables, flowers, ground mud, blood, crushed insects and seashells, squid ink, anything that’ll stain will do, and if the stain lasts, so much the better. We still use a lot of these ancient colours. However, Mummy Brown isn’t one of them.

Particularly prized by the Pre Raphaelites, Mummy Brown, as the name suggests, is a colour made out of the ground remains of Egyptian mummies. The rich brown comes from the chemicals used in the processes of embalming, as practiced in the ancient world, principally bitumen, which substance was considered responsible for the blackening of the remains of these ancient cadavers. The trade dates back centuries, with records of its export and use cropping up from several sources, including Samuel Pepys, in the 16th century, when production was at its peak.

Unsurprisingly, the colour began to fall out of favour towards the beginning of the 20th Century, in part due to greater respect for the field of archaeology, but as much to do with artists realizing where the pigment came from. Edward Burnes-Jones, on discovering that Mummy Brown was not just a fanciful name, immediately had his tube of the stuff interred, with some small ceremony, in his garden. Rudyard Kipling, a friend of Burnes-Jones, followed suit, burying his supply in his yard to try and right the wrongs of its sacrilegious use.

Nevertheless, the pigment remained in production until 1964 when the last supplies of the material used for its production ran out. According to the then managing director of Roberson’s artists colour makers: “We might have a few odd limbs lying around somewhere, but not enough to make any more paint. We sold our last complete mummy some years ago for, I think, £3. Perhaps we shouldn’t have. We certainly can’t get any more.”

This discovery has somewhat tainted my visits to art galleries as I now wonder how many of them are, literally, public mausoleums, but in researching this article, I have also discovered one more startling fact: that these ground remains were not only used as pigment, but were also employed (and consumed) for medicinal purposes…

References:

http://www.artinsociety.com/the-life-and-death-of-mummy-brown.html
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/ground-mummies-were-once-ingredient-paint-180950350/
http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-technology/mummy-brown-16th-century-paint-made-ground-mummies-001716